返回列表 发布新帖
查看: 104|回复: 0

[审稿意见] 晶体数据审稿意见-IUCr建议的估计值报道格式

887

帖子

972

积分

19

金币

版主

积分
972
发表于 2025-4-21 10:43:13 | 查看全部 |阅读模式
晶体数据审稿意见-IUCr建议的估计值报道格式
审稿意见:
They also need to revise the uncertainties (esd) for theirdihedral angles. Crystallographic convention is that uncertainties may havevalues ranging from 1-19. If the uncertainty is higher, it and the bond/angleassociated with it should be rounded off. For example, the A-C dihedral anglefor molecule 2b that is currentlyshown as 20.042(62) should be given as 20.04(6).https://www.iucr.org/resources/c ... statdes/recomm.html
大意:
他们还需要修改二面角的不确定度(esd)。晶体学惯例是,不确定度的值可以在1~19之间。不过不确定度较高,则应将其及其相关的键/角四舍五入。例如分子2bA-C二面角当前显示为20.042(62),应改为20.04(6)https://www.iucr.org/resources/commissions/crystallographic-nomenclature/statdes/recomm.html
国际晶体**合会IUCrInternational Union of Crystallography)推荐的估计值报告格式如下(信源:https://www.iucr.org/resources/commissions/crystallographic-nomenclature/statdes/recomm.html)(建议12):
12. The numerical value of an estimate y and its standard uncertainty u(y)should not be reported with an excessive number of digits. However, y should bequoted with sufficient accuracy to minimize the effect of round-off error* insubsequent calculations. In order to limit the round-off error of y (denoted by e) to 25% of u(y), u(y) should be quoted to two significantdigits in the range 10 to 19, implying that corresponding digits also be quotedfor y, and to one significant digit in the range 2 to 9. In general,uncertainties should be rounded up rather than to the nearest digit. Forexample, a bond distance of 1.54249 Å with a s.u. of 0.01532 Å should bereported as 1.542(16) Å (e = 3%), andone of 2.16352 Å with a s.u. of 0.00481 Å should be reported as 2.164(5) Å (e = 10%). Correlation coefficientsshould normally be quoted with two significant figures unless their absolutevalue is close to the value of 1.0 in which case three significant figuresshould be used.
* If u(y) is reported by a one- or two-digit,number, denoted by s that correspondsto the final digits in the value of y,then the largest round-off error of yis e = (50/s)% of u(y). Thus, for s = 1, e = 50%. In somefields of science (e.g. high-energyphysics), it common practice to limit the maximum round-off error to 5%, whichamounts to quoting u(y) always as a two-digit number (10 ≤ s ≤ 99). In addition to recommendation12, the IUCr admits this practice as an option.
上述内容大意如下:
估计值y的数值及其标准不确定度u(y)不应使用过多的数字进行报告。但是,应以足够的精度引用y,以尽量减少后续计算中四舍五入误差*的影响。为了将y的舍入误差(用e表示)限制在u(y)25%以内,u(y)应被引用到10~19范围内的两位有效数字上,也就是说y也被引用到相应的数字上,而u(y)被引用到2~9范围内的一位有效数字上。一般来说,不确定度应该四舍五入,而不是取最接近的数字。例如,键距为1.54249 Å,其标准不确定度s.u.0.01532 Å应报道为1.542(16)Åe = 3%),而键距为2.16352 Å标准不确定度s.u.0.00481Å则应报道为2.164(5) Åe = 10%)。相关系数通常应引用两位有效数字,除非其绝对值接近1.0,在这种情况下,应使用三位有效数字。
*如果u(y)由一位数或两位数表示,y值的最后一位数用s表示,则y的最大四舍五入误差为e = (50/s)%。因此,对于s = 1e = 50%。在某些科学领域(如高能物理学),通常的做法是将最大舍入误差限制在5%,这相当于将u(y)始终引用为两位数(10 s 99)。除建议12外,IUCr还承认这种做法是一种选择。
视频讲解请参阅:
晶体数据审稿意见-IUCr建议的估计值报道格式:https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1tbCDYMEpy
声明:本文仅代表个人观点,笔者学识有限,资料整理过程中可能存在疏漏错误,请不吝指正。
如需PDF文档,请从以下链接下载:
通过网盘分享的文件:晶体数据审稿意见-IUCr建议的估计值报道格式.pdf



您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

  • 微信小程序
  • 公众号
  • 微信客服

关于我们|Archiver|APP客户端|小黑屋|物质结构社区 ( 闽ICP备2024081439号-1 )

GMT+8, 2025-6-1 22:41 , Processed in 0.015083 second(s), 5 queries , Redis On.

Powered by Discuz! X5.0

© 2001-2025 Discuz! Team.

在本版发帖
科研需求联系客服
添加微信客服
返回顶部
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表