|
★声明:本文仅代表个人观点,笔者学识有限,资料整理过程中难免存在疏漏谬误,请不吝指正。 晶体测试案例151(降低Rint-光源选择和曝光时间) 最近,某课题组利用吲哚骨架手性配体与三甲基硅基亚甲基亚铜 [1]([CuCH2SiMe3]4, CCDC [2]: 1214451)以四氢呋喃 [3](THF, tetrahydrofuran, CAS: 109-99-9, CCDC: 1116822–1116823 [3a], 1116824–1116825 [3b])为溶剂进行反应,脱去四甲基硅烷(SiMe4, tetramethylsilane, CAS: 75-76-3),以期得到该配体参与配位成键的铜配合物,如图1所示(由ChemBioDraw[4]绘制)。 ▲图1 反应式 反应后处理所得产物利用甲苯 [5](Tol,toluene, CAS: 108-88-3, CCDC: 1273751 [5a], 1273752 [5b], 1273753 [5c], 725245 [5d], 1430464–1430470 [5e], 2377542 [5f])作为溶剂进行结晶,所得晶体进行单晶X射线衍射(SC-XRD, single-crystal X-ray diffraction)实验,得到晶体数据,找笔者帮忙解析。 第一个数据是用铜靶测试,曝光时间5秒,共46轮数据,6833帧衍射图,总大小为10.3 GB,其衍射图如图2所示(由APEX6 [6]呈现)。 ▲图2 铜靶数据衍射图 第一次处理,结构没解出来(后来发现是晶胞定错了),该铜靶数据共46轮数据,绝大数轮数据都没有衍射点,考虑到结构中含有比硅(Si)更大的原子,因此其绝对结构可以用钼靶测试(参阅推文“精修程序提示-绝对结构无法可靠确定(补充)”),故而将情况反馈并给出建议,如图3所示。 ▲图3 情况反馈和建议 后来按照正确晶胞处理,是可以得到结构的,只是数据很差,如图4所示(由Olex2[7]呈现),Rint非常高(123.46%),不过表征绝对结构的参数Hooft y [8]、Parson's q [9]和Flack x [10]都还比较小。 ▲图4 铜靶数据结果 情况反馈和建议后,对方表示在铜靶数据之前,其实有一个钼靶测试的数据,曝光时间为2秒,共8轮数据,2070帧衍射图,总大小为3.13 GB,其衍射图如图5所示,在该曝光时间下,衍射弱,分辨率低。 ▲图5 钼靶数据衍射图 ▲图6 钼靶数据结果 钼靶的这个数据,显然比铜靶数据好多了,只是曝光时间短了些,导致衍射弱,最终结果数据指标不理想,于是建议其增加曝光时间,用钼靶重新测个数据,如图7所示。 ▲图7 建议 后来用钼靶重新测试,曝光时间设置为15秒,测定晶胞后,Bravais Lattice选择Monoclinic P,对称性选择Chiral (2)来计算数据收集策略,总共9轮数据,2484帧衍射图,总大小4.05 GB,其衍射图如图8所示。 ▲图8 增加曝光时间重新测试的钼靶数据衍射图 重测数据结果如图9所示,数据各项指标都非常好。 ▲图9 增加曝光时间重新测试的钼靶数据结果 三个数据对比如下表: | 项目 | 260723k | 260723i | 260724j | | 辐射光源 | | | | | 衍射图轮数 | | | | | 衍射图帧数 | | | | | 衍射图大小 | | | | | 分辨率(d min)/Å | | | | | 信噪比(I/σ(I)) | | | | | Rint | | | | | 完整度(completeness) | | | | | Max Peak/e·Å–3 | | | | | Min Peak/e·Å–3 | | | | | 拟合优度(GooF) | | | | | R1 | | | | | wR2 | | | |
由此可见,选择合适的辐射光源,设置适当的曝光时间,才能够得到良好的数据结果。 关于结构,由于[CuCH2SiMe]4是通过碘化亚铜 [12](CuI, Copper(I) iodide, CAS: 7681-65-4; CCDC: 1594151 [12a], 1600048 [12b], 1600783–1600784 [12c], 1602525 [12d], 1604540–1604544 [12e], 1604707 [12f], 1606466–1606471 [12g], 1608909[12h], 1624288 [12i], 1637167 [12j], 1638550–1638554 [12k], 1640440–1640481 [12l], 1644229[12m], 1673978–1673979 [12n], 1679593–1679618 [12o], 1679963–1679964 [12p],1713334–1713337 [12q], 2149217 [12r])和三甲基硅基亚甲基锂 [13](LiCH2SiMe3)(LiCH2SiMe3 [13b], [(Trimethylsilyl)methyl]lithium, CAS:1822-00-0; 晶体结构表明三甲基硅基亚甲基锂有四聚体和六聚体形式:(LiCH2SiMe3)4 [13a, 13d], CAS:14322-84-0, 210177-05-2; (LiCH2SiMe3)6 [13c, 13e-h], CAS:110558-46-8; CCDC: 1181797 [13c], 1960466 [13h])合成的,可能是后处理没有分离干净,导致所合成的[CuCH2SiMe]4不纯,含有原料CuI或LiCH2SiMe3,因此所得结构中含有碘或锂,如图10–12所示。 ▲图10 结构问题讨论 ▲图11 结构问题讨论 ▲图12 结构问题讨论 参考文献 [1] Jarvis, J. A. J.; Pearce, R.; Lappert, M. F.Silylmethyl and Related Complexes. Part 4. Preparation, Properties, and Crystaland Molecular Structure of Tetrakis[(trimethylsilylmethyl)copper(I)], anAlkyl-bridged, Square-planar, Tetranuclear Copper(I) Cluster. J. Chem. Soc.Dalton Trans. 1977, 999–1003. DOI: 10.1039/dt9780000734. [2] (a) Allen, F. H. The CambridgeStructural Database: A Quarter of a Million Crystal Structures and Rising. Acta Cryst. 2002, B58, 380–388. DOI: 10.1107/S0108768102003890. (b) Groom, C. R.;Bruno, I. J.; Lightfoot, M. P.; Ward, S. C. The Cambridge Structural Database. Acta Cryst. 2016, B72, 171–179. DOI: 10.1107/S2052520616003954. (c) Mitchell, J.;Robertson, J. H.; Raithby, P. R. Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC).Comprehensive Coordination Chemistry III2021, 413–437. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-409547-2.14829-2. [3] (a) Luger, P.; Buschmann, J. TwistConformation of Tetrahydrofuran in the Crystal. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1983,22, 410. DOI: 10.1002/anie.198304101. (b) David, W. I. F.; Ibberson, R. M. AReinvestigation of the Structure of Tetrahydrofuran by High-Resolution NeutronPowder Diffraction. Acta Cryst. 1992, C48, 301–303. DOI: 10.1107/S0108270191008582. [4] (a) Klein, F. M. CS ChemDraw Pro,1Version 3.1 for Windows. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1995, 35, 166–167. DOI: 10.1021/ci00023a026. (b)Cousins, K. R. ChemDraw 6.0 Ultra CambridgeSoft Corporation, 100 Cambridge ParkDrive, Cambridge, MA 02140. http://www.camsoft.com. Commercial Price: $1395.Academic Price: $699. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 10257–10258. DOI: 10.1021/ja0047572.(c) Buntrock, R. E. ChemOffice Ultra 7.0. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 1505–1506. DOI: 10.1021/ci025575p. (d) Li, Z.; Wan, H.; Shi, Y.;Ouyang, P. Personal Experience with Four Kinds of Chemical Structure DrawingSoftware: Review on ChemDraw, ChemWindow, ISIS/Draw, and ChemSketch. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 1886–1890. DOI: 10.1021/ci049794h.(e) Mendelsohn, L. D. ChemDraw8 Ultra, Windows and Macintosh Versions. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 2225–2226. DOI: 10.1021/ci040123t. (f) Cousins, K. R. ChemDrawUltra 9.0. CambridgeSoft, 100 CambridgePark Drive, Cambridge, MA 02140. www.cambridgesoft.com. See Web site for pricing options. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 4115–4116. DOI:10.1021/ja0410237. (g) Zielesny, A. Chemistry Software PackageChemOffice Ultra 2005. J. Chem. Inf.Model. 2005, 45, 1474–1477. DOI:10.1021/ci050273j. (h) Mills, N. ChemDraw Ultra 10.0 CambridgeSoft, 100CambridgePark Drive, Cambridge, MA 02140. www.cambridgesoft.com. CommercialPrice: $1910 for download, $2150 for CD-ROM; Academic Price: $710 fordownload, $800 for CD-ROM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 13649–13650. DOI: 10.1021/ja0697875. (i) Kerwin, S. M.ChemBioOffice Ultra 2010 Suite. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 2466–2467. DOI: 10.1021/ja1005306. (j) Milne, G. W. A. SoftwareReview of ChemBioDraw 12.0. J. Chem. Inf.Model. 2010, 50, 2053. DOI:10.1021/ci100385n. (k) Narayanaswamy, V. K.; Rissdörfer, M.; Odhav, B.Review on CambridgeSoft ChemBioDraw Ultra 13.0v. Int. J. Theor. Appl. Sci. 2013, 5, 43–49. [5] (a) Anderson, M.; Bosio, L.; Bruneaux-Poulle, J.; Fourme, R. Toluène: Structure Cristalline et Moléculairede la Variété Stable α et état Amorphe J. Chim. Phys. 1977, 74,68–73. DOI: 10.1051/jcp/1977740068. (b) Bosto, L.; Bruneaux-Poulle, J.;Defrain, A.; Dupont, M. C. R. Acad. Sci. Ser. C (Chim) 1973, 276,1667. (c) Ibberson, R.M.; David, W. I. F.; Prager, M. Accurate Determination of Hydrogen AtomPositions In Α-Toluene by Neutron Powder Diffraction. J. Chem. Soc. Chem.Commun. 1992, 1438–1439. DOI: 10.1039/c39920001438.(d) Nayak, S. K.;Sathishumar, R.; Row, T. N. G. Directing Role of Functional Groups in SelectiveGeneration Of C–H⋯πInteractions: In Situ Cryo-Crystallographic Studies on BenzylDerivatives. CrystEngComm 2010, 12, 3112–3118. DOI: 10.1039/c001190h. (e) Marciniak, J.; Bąkowicz, J.; Dobrowolski, M. A.;Dziubek, K. F.; Kaźmierczak, M.; Paliwoda, D.; Rajewski, K. W.; Sobczak, S.;Stachowicz, M.; Katrusiak, A. Most Frequent Organic Interactions Compressed inToluene. Cryst. Growth Des. 2016, 16, 1435–1441. DOI: 10.1021/acs.cgd.5b01538. (f) Andre, D.; Fourme, R.;Bruneaus-Poulle, J.; Bosio, L. Crystal Structure of the Metastable β-Phase ofToluene. J. Mol. Struct. 1982, 81, 253–259. DOI: 10.1016/0022-2860(82)85338-6. [6] Bruker (2024). APEX6 (Version 2025.6-0).Program for Data Collection on Area Detectors. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison,Wisconsin, USA. [7] Dolomanov, O. V.; Bourhis, L. J.;Gildea, R. J.; Howard, J. A. K.; Puschmann, H. OLEX2: A Complete Structure Solution, Refinement and Analysis Program.J. Appl. Cryst. 2009, 42, 339–341. DOI:10.1107/S0021889808042726. [8] (a) Hooft, R. W. W.; Straver, L. H.; Spek,A. L. Determination of Absolute Structure using Bayesian Statistics on BijvoetDifferences. J. Appl. Cryst. 2008, 41, 96–103. DOI: 10.1107/S0021889807059870. (b) Hooft, R. W. W.; Straver, L. H.; Spek,A. L. Using the t-Distribution toImprove the Absolute Structure Assignment with Likelihood Calculations. J. Appl. Cryst. 2010, 43, 665–668. DOI: 10.1107/S0021889810018601. [9] Parsons, S.; Flack, H. PreciseAbsolute-Structure Determination in Light-Atom Crystals. Acta Cryst. 2004, A60, s61. DOI:10.1107/S0108767304098800. [10] Flack, H. D. On Enantiomorph-PolarityEstimation. Acta Cryst. 1983, A39, 876–881. DOI: 10.1107/S0108767383001762. [11] (a) Spek, A. L. Single-Crystal Structure Validation with theProgram PLATON. J. Appl. Cryst. 2003, 36, 7–13. DOI: 10.1107/S0021889802022112. (b) Spek, A. L. StructureValidation in Chemical Crystallography. ActaCryst. 2009, D65, 148–155. DOI:10.1107/S090744490804362X. (c) Spek, A. L. What Makes a Crystal Structure Report Valid? Inorg. Chim. Acta 2018, 470, 232–237. DOI:10.1016/j.ica.2017.04.036. (d) Spek, A. L. checkCIFValidation ALERTS: What They Mean and How to Respond. Acta Cryst. 2020, E76, 1–11. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989019016244. [12] (a) Bhalla, A. S.; White, E. W.Crystallographic Polarity Determination of Γ-CuI. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B:Struct. Sci. 1971, 27, 852–853. (b) Wyckoff, R. W. G.;Posnjak, E. The Crystal Structures of the Cuprous Halides. J. Am. Chem. Soc.1922, 44, 30–36. (c) Krug, J.; Sieg, L. Die Struktur DerHochtemperatur-Modifikationen Des Cubr Und Cuj. Zeitschrift fuerNaturforschung, Teil A. Physikalische Chemie, Kosmophysik 1952, 7,369–371. (d) Batchelor, R.; Birchall, T. Structure of Cuprous Iodide, Polytype12r. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B: Struct. Sci. 1982, 38,1260–1263. (e) Bührer, W.; Hälg, W. Crystal Structure of High-TemperatureCuprous Iodide and Cuprous Bromide. Electrochim. Acta 1977, 22,701–704. (f) Kurdyumova, R. N.; Baranova, R. V. An Electron Diffraction Studyof Thin Films of Cuprous Iodide. Kristallografiya 1961, 6,402–405. (g) Yude, Y.; Boysen, H.; Schulz, H. Neutron Powder Investigation ofCui. Z. Krist. Cryst. Mater. 1990, 191, 79–91. (h) Miyake,S.; Hoshino, S.; Takenaka, T. On the Phase Transition in Cuprous Iodide. J.Phys. Soc. Jpn. 1952, 7, 19–24. (i) Vegard, L.; Skofteland,G. Röntgenometrische Untersuchungen Der Aus Den Substanzen Cucl, Cubr Und CujGebildeten Binären Mischkristallsysteme. Archiv for Mathematik ogNaturvidenskab 1942, 45, 163. (j) Cooper, M. A.; Hawthorne,F. C. A Note on the Crystal Structure of Marshite. Can. Mineral. 1997,35, 785–786. (k) Hull, S.; Keen, D. A. High-Pressure Polymorphism of theCopper(I) Halides: A Neutron-Diffraction Study to ∼10 Gpa. Phys. Rev. B 1994, 50,5868–5885. (l) Keen, D. A.; Hull, S. The High-Temperature Structural Behaviourof Copper(I) Iodide. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 1995, 7,5793–5804. (m) Sakuma, T. Crystal Structure of Β-Cui. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.1988, 57, 565–569. (n) Yashima, M.; Xu, Q.; Yoshiasa, A.; Wada,S. Crystal Structure, Electron Density and Diffusion Path of the Fast-IonConductor Copper Iodide Cui. J. Mater. Chem. 2006, 16,4393–4396. (o) Shan, Y.; Li, G.; Tian, G.; Han, J.; Wang, C.; Liu, S.; Du, H.;Yang, Y. Description of the Phase Transitions of Cuprous Iodide. J. AlloysCompd. 2009, 477, 403–406. (p) Adipranoto, D. S.; Shikanai,F.; Yonemura, M.; Mori, K.; Park, J. G.; Itoh, K.; Kamiyama, T.Structure-Property Relationships of Fast Copper Ion Conductor Cubic Cui. SolidState Ionics 2009, 180, 492–496. (q) Hofmann, M.; Hull, S.;Keen, D. A. High-Pressure Phase of Copper(I) Iodide. Phys. Rev. B 1995,51, 12022–12025. (r) Zhang, H.; Zhang, B. Fast Crack Kinking Manipulatedby Atomic Hoop Stress in Monolayer Hexagonal Boron Nitride Strip. Comput.Mater. Sci. 2018, 154, 1–7. [13] (a) Hartwell, G. E.; Brown, T. L. The MassSpectra of Lithiomethyltrimethylsilane and Lithium t-Butoxide. Inorg. Chem.1966, 5, 1257–1259. (b) Tessier-Youngs, C.; Jr., O. T. B.;Oliver, J. P.; Butcher, K. [(Trimethylsilyl)Methyl]Lithium. Inorg. Synth.1986, 24, 95–97. (c) Tecle', B.; Rahman, A. F. M. M.; Oliver, J.P. X-Ray Crystal Structure of Trimethylsilylmethyllithium. J. Organomet.Chem. 1986, 317, 267–275. (d) Schmitz, R. F.; Vos, M. Heatsof Lewis Base Complexation, Deaggregation and Stabilization by α-Silicon in aFamily of Primary Alkyllithiums. Chem. Commun. 1998, 1099–1100.(e) Tatic, T.; Ott, H.; Stalke, D. Deaggregation ofTrimethylsilylmethyllithium. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 2008,3765–3768. (f) Tatic, T.; Meindl, K.; Henn, J.; Pandey, S. K.; Stalke, D. TheFirst Asymmetric Organolithium Tetramers with Simple Ether Donor Bases. Chem.Commun. 2010, 46, 4562–4564. (g) Tatic, T.; Hermann, S.;John, M.; Loquet, A.; Lange, A.; Stalke, D. Pure α‐Metallated Benzyllithiumfrom a Single‐Crystal‐to‐Single‐Crystal Transition. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2011, 50, 6666–6669. (h) Bauer, J. O. The Crystal Structure ofthe Triclinic Polymorph of Hexameric (Trimethylsilyl)methyllithium, C24H66Li6Si6.Z. Kristallogr. NCS 2020, 235, 353–356.
|